Endometriyum ve Serviks Malignitelerinde Fertilite Koruyucu Yaklaşım

Authors

References

Lee NK, Cheung MK, Shin JY, et al. Prognostic factors for uterine cancer in reproductive-aged women. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109:655.
Cote ML, Ruterbusch JJ, Olson SH, et al. The Growing Burden of Endometrial Cancer: A Major Racial Disparity Affecting Black Women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2015; 24:1407.
NCCN. Cancer risks in Lynch syndrome by gene compared to the general population. version 3.2019 https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/genetics_colon.pdf (Accessed on January 13, 2020).
Chan JL, Letourneau J, Salem W, et al. Regret around fertility choices is decreased with pre-treatment counseling in gynecologic cancer patients. J Cancer Surviv 2017; 11:58.
Eskander RN, Randall LM, Berman ML, et al. Fertility preserving options in patients with gynecologic malignancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205:103.
Walsh C, Holschneider C, Hoang Y, et al. Coexisting ovarian malignancy in young women with endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106:693.
Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO). SGO Clinical Practice Statement: Screening for Lynch Syndrome in Endometrial Cancer. https://www.sgo.org/clinical-practice/guidelines/screening-for-lynch-syndrome-in-endometrial-cancer/ (Accessed on June 03, 2019).
Dijkhuizen FP, Mol BW, Brölmann HA, Heintz AP. The accuracy of endometrial sampling in the diagnosis of patients with endometrial carcinoma and hyperplasia: a meta-analysis. Cancer 2000; 89:1765.
Larson DM, Johnson KK, Broste SK, et al. Comparison of D&C and office endometrial biopsy in predicting final histopathologic grade in endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 86:38-42.
Zarbo G, Caruso G, Caruso S, et al. Endometrial cancer: preoperative evaluation of myometrial infiltration magnetic resonance imaging versus transvaginal ultrasonography. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2000; 21:95.
Varpula MJ, Klemi PJ. Staging of uterine endometrial carcinoma with ultra-low field (0.02 T) MRI: a comparative study with CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993; 17:641.
Montz FJ, Bristow RE, Bovicelli A, et al. Intrauterine progesterone treatment of early endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186:651.
Jadoul P, Donnez J. Conservative treatment may be beneficial for young women with atypical endometrial hyperplasia or endometrial adenocarcinoma. Fertil Steril 2003; 80:1315.
Kaku T, Yoshikawa H, Tsuda H, et al. Conservative therapy for adenocarcinoma and atypical endometrial hyperplasia of the endometrium in young women: central pathologic review and treatment outcome. Cancer Lett 2001; 167:39.
Park JY, Kim DY, Kim JH, et al. Long-term oncologic outcomes after fertility-sparing management using oral progestin for young women with endometrial cancer (KGOG 2002). Eur J Cancer 2013; 49:868.
Ushijima K, Yahata H, Yoshikawa H, et al. Multicenter phase II study of fertility-sparing treatment with medroxyprogesterone acetate for endometrial carcinoma and atypical hyperplasia in young women. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25:2798.
Kim MK, Seong SJ, Song T, et al. Comparison of dilatation & curettage and endometrial aspiration biopsy accuracy in patients treated with high-dose oral progestin plus levonorgestrel intrauterine system for early-stage endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2013; 130:470.
Bakkum-Gamez JN, Kalogera E, Keeney GL, et al. Conservative management of atypical hyperplasia and grade I endometrial carcinoma: Review of the literature and presentation of a series. J Gynecol Surg 2012; 28:262.
Gunderson CC, Fader AN, Carson KA, Bristow RE. Oncologic and reproductive outcomes with progestin therapy in women with endometrial hyperplasia and grade 1 adenocarcinoma: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 2012; 125:477.
Qin Y, Yu Z, Yang J, et al. Oral Progestin Treatment for Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2016; 26:1081.
Eftekhar Z, Izadi-Mood N, Yarandi F, et al. Efficacy of megestrol acetate (megace) in the treatment of patients with early endometrial adenocarcinoma: our experiences with 21 patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009; 19:249.
Abu Hashim H, Ghayaty E, El Rakhawy M. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system vs oral progestins for non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213:469.
Thigpen JT, Brady MF, Alvarez RD, et al. Oral medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a dose-response study by the Gynecologic Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17:1736.
Kim MK, Seong SJ, Kim YS, et al. Combined medroxyprogesterone acetate/levonorgestrel-intrauterine system treatment in young women with early-stage endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209:358.e1.
Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Vergote I, et al. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Jan;31(1):12-39.
Kandoth C, Schultz N, Cherniack AD, et al. The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Nature. 2013;497: 67.
Raffone A, Travaglino A, Zullo FM, et al. Predictive Accuracy of Progesterone Receptor B in Young Women with Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Early Endometrial Cancer Treated with Hysteroscopic Resection plus LNG-IUD Insertion. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2021; 28:1244.
Yang B, Xu Y, Zhu Q, et al. Treatment efficiency of comprehensive hysteroscopic evaluation and lesion resection combined with progestin therapy in young women with endometrial atypical hyperplasia and endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2019; 153:55.
Chang YN, Zhang Y, Wang YJ, et al. Effect of hysteroscopy on the peritoneal dissemination of endometrial cancer cells: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2011; 96:957.
Cho A, Lee SW, Park JY, et al. Continued medical treatment for persistent early endometrial cancer in young women. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 160:413.
Ayhan A, Fagotti A, Gultekin M, et al. Textbook of Gynaecological Oncology. Platinum Edition. ESGO. 2023. Turkiye. 52; 519-531.
American Cancer Society (ACS). Key Statistics for Cervical Cancer. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cervical-cancer/about/ (Accessed on November 18, 2020).
Reade CJ, Eiriksson LR, Covens A. Surgery for early stage cervical cancer: how radical should it be? Gynecol Oncol. 2013. 131; 222-230.
Machida H, Iwata T, Okugawa K, et al. Fertility-sparing trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A proposal of an ideal candidate. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 156:341.
Manganaro L, Lakhman Y, Bharwani N, et al. Staging, recurrence and follow-up of uterine cervical cancer using MRI: Updated Guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology after revised FIGO staging 2018. Eur Radiol 2021; 31:7802.
Thomakos N, Trachana SP, Rodolakis A, et al. Less Radical Surgery for Fertility Preservation in Patients with Early-Stage Invasive Cervical Cancer Contemporary Problematics. Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2013.3;165.
Zusterzeel PL, Pol FJ, van Ham M, et al. Vaginal Radical Trachelectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Increased Recurrence Risk for Adenocarcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2016; 26:1293.
Li X, Li J, Jiang Z, et al. Oncological results and recurrent risk factors following abdominal radical trachelectomy: an updated series of 333 patients. BJOG 2019; 126:1169.
Noël P, Dubé M, Plante M, et al. Early cervical carcinoma and fertility-sparing treatment options: MR imaging as a tool in patient selection and a follow-up modality. Radiographics 2014; 34:1099.
Plante M, Gregoire J, Renaud MC, et al. The vaginal radical trachelectomy: an update of a series of 125 cases and 106 pregnancies Gynecol Oncol 2011; 121:290.
Plante M, Renaud MC, Sebastianelli A, et al. Simple vaginal trachelectomy in women with early-stage low-risk cervical cancer who wish to preserve fertility: the new standard of care? Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 30:981.
Li X, Xia L, Chen X, et al. Simple conization and pelvic lymphadenectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A retrospective analysis and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 158:231.
Lanowska M, Mangler M, Spek A, et al. Radical vaginal trachelectomy (RVT) combined with laparoscopic lymphadenectomy: prospective study of 225 patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2011; 21:1458.
Cibula D, Lindegaard J, Raspollini MR, et al. ESGO-ESTRO-ESP 2023 Update of the Cervical Cancer Guidelines. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023 May 1.
Plante M. Evolution in fertility-preserving options for early-stage cervical cancer: radical trachelectomy, simple trachelectomy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2013; 23:982.
Chernofsky MR, Felix JC, Muderspach LI, et al. Influence of quantity of lymph vascular space invasion on time to recurrence in women with early-stage squamous cancer of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol 2006; 100:288.
Peters WA, Liu PY, Barrett RJ, et al. Concurrent Chemotherapy and Pelvic Radiation Therapy Compared With Pelvic Radiation Therapy Alone as Adjuvant Therapy After Radical Surgery in High-Risk Early-Stage Cancer of the Cervix. Clin Oncol. 2000;18:1606–1613.
Sedlis A, Bundy BN, Rotman MZ, et al. A Randomized Trial of Pelvic Radiation Therapy versus No Further Therapy in Selected Patients with Stage IB Carcinoma of the Cervix after Radical Hysterectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol. Oncol. 1999;73:177–183.
Maneo A, Chiari S, Bonazzi C, Mangioni C. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and conservative surgery for stage IB1 cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 111:438.
Plante M, van Trommel N, Lheureux S, et al. FIGO 2018 stage IB2 (2-4 cm) Cervical cancer treated with Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by fertility Sparing Surgery (CONTESSA); Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Conservative Surgery in Cervical Cancer to Preserve Fertility (NEOCON-F). A PMHC, DGOG, GCIG/CCRN and multicenter study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2019; 29:969.
Li R, Lu ST, Si JG, et al. Prognostic value of responsiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery for patients with stage IB(2)/IIA(2) cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2013; 128:524.
Russo L, Gui B, Miccò M, et al. The role of MRI in cervical cancer > 2 cm (FIGO stage IB2-IIA1) conservatively treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by conization: a pilot study. Radiol Med 2021; 126:1055.
Bentivegna E, Maulard A, Pautier P, et al. Fertility results and pregnancy outcomes after conservative treatment of cervical cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Fertil Steril 2016; 106:1195.
Lee KB, Shim SH, Lee JM. Comparison between adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy after radical surgery in patients with cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. J Gynecol Oncol 2018; 29:e62.
van Kol KGG, Vergeldt TFM, Bekkers RLM. Abdominal radical trachelectomy versus chemotherapy followed by vaginal radical trachelectomy in stage 1B2 (FIGO 2018) cervical cancer. A systematic review on fertility and recurrence rates. Gynecol Oncol 2019; 155:515.
Morice P, Maulard A, Scherier S, et al. Oncologic results of fertility sparing surgery of cervical cancer: An updated systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 165:169.
Marchiole P, Benchaib M, Buenerd A, et al. Oncological safety of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal radical trachelectomy (LARVT or Dargent's operation): a comparative study with laparoscopic-assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy (LARVH). Gynecol Oncol 2007; 106:132.
Beiner ME, Hauspy J, Rosen B, et al. Radical vaginal trachelectomy vs. radical hysterectomy for small early stage cervical cancer: a matched case-control study. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 110:168.
Schmeler KM, Pareja R, Lopez Blanco A, et al. ConCerv: a prospective trial of conservative surgery for low-risk early-stage cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:1317.
Hartman CA, Teixeira JC, Barbosa SB, et al. Analysis of Conservative Surgical Treatment and Prognosis of Microinvasive Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix Stage IA1: Results of Follow-Up to 20 Years. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2017; 27:357.
Shepherd JH. Uterus-conserving surgery for invasive cervical cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 19:577.
Schuurman TN, Schaafsma M, To KH, et al. Optimising follow-up strategy based on cytology and human papillomavirus after fertility-sparing surgery for early stage cervical cancer: a nationwide, population-based, retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:1349.
Carter J, Sonoda Y, Abu-Rustum NR. Reproductive concerns of women treated with radical trachelectomy for cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 105:13.
Shepherd JH, Mould T, Oram DH. Radical trachelectomy in early stage carcinoma of the cervix: outcome as judged by recurrence and fertility rates. BJOG 2001; 108:882.
Bentivegna E, Maulard A, Pautier P, et al. Fertility results and pregnancy outcomes after conservative treatment of cervical cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Fertil Steril 2016; 106:1195.

Published

April 29, 2024

License

License

How to Cite

1.
Çevikoğlu Kıllı M. Endometriyum ve Serviks Malignitelerinde Fertilite Koruyucu Yaklaşım. In: Demir SC, editor. Güncel Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Çalışmaları VII (Bahar) [Internet]. Türkiye: Academician Publishing Book DOI Portal; 2024 [cited 2026 Jul. 13]. pp. 25-38. Available from: https://www.omp35.books.akademisyen.net/index.php/akya/catalog/book/3066/chapter/13403