Laboratuvar Ölçekli Anaerobik Çürütme Sistemlerinde Veri Toplama ve Analizi
Referanslar
Jain, M. Anaerobic membrane bioreactor as highly efficient and reliable technology for wastewater treatment—a review. Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science; 2018;8(02), 82.
Ferronato N, Torretta V. Waste mismanagement in developing countries: A review of global issues. International journal of environmental research and public health; 2019;16(6):1060.
Pandian I, Begum S, Kumaravel SP. An integrated IoT and fuzzy logic controller system for biogas digester to predict methane generation. Environment, Development and Sustainability; 2021;1-13.
Yang S, Svoronos SA, Pullammanappallil P. Development of Inexpensive, Automatic, Real-Time Measurement System for On-Line Methane Content and Biogas Flowrate. Waste and Biomass Valorization; 2022; 13(12), 4839-4849.
Corneli E, Dragoni F, Adessi A, et al. Energy conversion of biomass crops and agroindustrial residues by combined biohydrogen/biomethane system and anaerobic digestion. Bioresource technology.; 2016; 211, 509–518.
Wu N, Moreira CM, Zhang Y, et al. Techno-economic analysis of biogas production from microalgae through anaerobic digestion. Anaerobic Digestion; 2019; 1-33.
Wu N, Demchuk Z, Voronov A, et al. Sustainable manufacturing of polymeric materials: A techno-economic analysis of soybean oil-based acrylic monomers production. Journal of Cleaner Production; 2021; 286, 124939.
Zhang P. Biogas recovery from anaerobic digestion of selected industrial wastes. Advances in Biofuels and Bioenergy; 2018; 251-271.
Yang S, Liu Y, Wu N, et al. Low-cost, Arduino-based, portable device for measurement of methane composition in biogas. Renewable Energy; 2019; 138, 224-229.
IRENA. Global Energy Transformation: A Roadmap to 2050. International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA); 2018; Abu Dhabi.
Özcan MD, Özcan O, Kibar ME, et al. Preparation of Ni-CeO2/MgAl hydrotalcite-like catalyst for biogas oxidative steam reforming. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University; 2019; 34 (3): 1127-1141.
Abraham A, Mathew AK, Park H, et al. Pretreatment strategies for enhanced biogas production from lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource technology; 2020; 301: 1-13.
Savand-Roumi E, Salehiyoun AR, Mohtasebi SS. Use of a biogas-specific e-nose with machine learning to identify biogas pattern changes linked to hydraulic retention times in an anaerobic digester: A case study. Fuel; 2024; 357, 130013.
Theuerl S, Klang J, Prochnow A. Process disturbances in agricultural biogas production—Causes, mechanisms and effects on the biogas microbiome: A review. Energies; 2019;12(3), 365.
Theuerl S, Herrmann C, Heiermann M, et al. The future agricultural biogas plant in Germany: A vision. Energies; 2019; 12(3), 396.
Persson M, Jönsson O, Wellinger A. Biogas upgrading to vehicle fuel standards and grid injection. IEA Bioenergy task; 2006;Vol. 37, pp. 1-34.
Yentekakis IV, Goula G, Leone P, et al. Advanced utilization and management of biogas. Frontiers in Environmental Science; 2018; 6, 75.
EPA. Approved Pathways for Renewable Fuel 2023. https://www.epa.gov/renewable-fuel-standard-program/approved-pathways-renewable-fuel. Erişim tarihi: 10.11.2023.
Khoshnevisan B, Tsapekos P, Alvarado-Morales M, et al. Life cycle assessment of different strategies for energy and nutrient recovery from source sorted organic fraction of household waste. Journal of cleaner production; 2018; 180, 360-374.
Bolzonella D, Pavan P, Battistoni P, et al. Mesophilic anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge: influence of the solid retention time in the wastewater treatment process. Process Biochemistry; 2005; 40(3–4), 1453–1460.
Kim JK, Oh BR, Chun YN, et al. Effects of temperature and hydraulic retention time on anaerobic digestion of food waste. Journal of Bioscience and bioengineering; 2006; 102(4), 328-332.
Nagao N, Tajima N, Kawai M, et al. Maximum organic loading rate for the single-stage wet anaerobic digestion of food waste. Bioresource technology; 2012; 118, 210-218.
Lewis JJ, Hollingsworth JW, Chartier RT, et al. Biogas stoves reduce firewood use, household air pollution, and hospital visits in Odisha, India. Environmental science & technology; 2017; 51(1), 560-569.
Horiuchi JI, Shimizu T, Tada K, et al. Selective production of organic acids in anaerobic acid reactor by pH control. Bioresource technology; 2002; 82(3), 209–213.
Giuliano A, Bolzonella D, Pavan P, et al. Co-digestion of livestock effluents, energy crops and agro-waste: feeding and process optimization in mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. Bioresource technology; 2013; 128, 612-618.
Wellinger A, Murphy JD, Baxter D. The biogas handbook: science, production and applications. Elsevier; 2013.
Khanal SK, Chen WH, Li L, et al. Biological hydrogen production: effects of pH and intermediate products. International journal of hydrogen energy; 2004;29(11), 1123–1131.
Liu D, Zeng RJ, Angelidaki I. Effects of pH and hydraulic retention time on hydrogen production versus methanogenesis during anaerobic fermentation of organic household solid waste under extreme‐thermophilic temperature (70° C). Biotechnology and bioengineering; 2008;100(6), 1108-1114.
Drosg B. Process monitoring in biogas plants. Paris, France: IEA bioenergy; 2013. p. 1-38.
Pera AL, Sellaro M, Bianco M, et al. Effects of a temporary increase in OLR and a simultaneous decrease in HRT on dry anaerobic digestion of OFMSW. Environmental Technology; 2022;43(28), 4463-4471.
David B, Federico, B, Cristina C, et al. Biohythane production from food wastes. In Biohydrogen. Elsevier; 2019. p. 347-368.
Nkuna, R., Roopnarain, A., Rashama, C., Adeleke, R. Insights into organic loading rates of anaerobic digestion for biogas production: a review. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology; 2022;42(4), 487-507.
Song H, Zhang Y, Kusch-Brandt S, et al. Comparison of variable and constant loading for mesophilic food waste digestion in a long-term experiment. Energies; 2020;13(5), 1279.
Parajuli A, Khadka A, Sapkota L, et al. Effect of hydraulic retention time and organic-loading rate on two-staged, semi-continuous mesophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste during start-up. Fermentation; 2022;8(11), 620.
Jiang J, He S, Kang X, et al. Effect of organic loading rate and temperature on the anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste: process performance and energy recovery. Frontiers in Energy Research; 2020;8, 89.
Afridi ZUR, Qammar NW. Technical challenges and optimization of biogas plants. ChemBioEng Reviews; 2020;7(4), 119-129.
Ilangovan P, Begum MS, Srividhya PK. Development of online monitoring device and performance evaluation of biogas plants using enhanced methane prediction algorithm (EMPA). Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments; 2023;56, 103041.
Mittal S, Ahlgren EO, Shukla PR. Barriers to biogas dissemination in India: A review. Energy Policy; 2018;112, 361-370.
Manjusha C, Beevi BS. Mathematical modeling and simulation of anaerobic digestion of solid waste. Procedia Technology; 2016;24, 654-660.
Gupta A. Making biogas smart using internet of things (lot). In 2020 4th International Conference on Electronics, Materials Engineering & Nano-Technology (IEMENTech); 2020. p. 1-4. IEEE.
Polag D, May T, Müller L, et al. Online monitoring of stable carbon isotopes of methane in anaerobic digestion as a new tool for early warning of process instability. Bioresource technology; 2015;197, 161-170.
Lara-Cisneros G, Aguilar-López R, Femat R. On the dynamic optimization of methane production in anaerobic digestion via extremum-seeking control approach. Computers & Chemical Engineering; 2015;75, 49-59.
Ardali NR, Zarghami R, Gharebagh RS. Optimized Data Driven Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Chemical Processes. Computers & Chemical Engineering; 2024;108712.
Auffarth B. Machine Learning for Time-Series with Python: Forecast, predict, and detect anomalies with state-of-the-art machine learning methods. Packt Publishing Ltd.;2021.
Cinar S, Cinar SO, Wieczorek N, et al. Integration of artificial intelligence into biogas plant operation. Processes; 2021; 9(1), 85.
Cruz IA, Andrade LR, Bharagava RN, et al. An overview of process monitoring for anaerobic digestion. Biosystems Engineering; 2021;207, 106-119.
Pandyaswargo AH, Jagath Dickella Gamaralalage P, Liu C, et al. Challenges and an implementation framework for sustainable municipal organic waste management using biogas technology in emerging Asian Countries. Sustainability; 2019;11(22), 6331.
Jafari NH, Stark TD, Thalhamer T. Spatial and temporal characteristics of elevated temperatures in municipal solid waste landfills. Waste management; 2017; 59, 286-301.
Krause MJ, Chickering GW, et al. Effects of temperature and particle size on the biochemical methane potential of municipal solid waste components. Waste Management; 2018;71, 25-30.
Nelson DD, McManus B, Urbanski S, et al. High precision measurements of atmospheric nitrous oxide and methane using thermoelectrically cooled mid-infrared quantum cascade lasers and detectors. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy; 2004;60(14), 3325-3335.
Fisher R, Lowry D, Wilkin O, et al. High‐precision, automated stable isotope analysis of atmospheric methane and carbon dioxide using continuous‐flow isotope‐ratio mass spectrometry. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry: An International Journal Devoted to the Rapid Dissemination of Up‐to‐the‐Minute Research in Mass Spectrometry; 2006;20(2), 200-208.
Peng L, Ping L, Cai LA, et al. Design and implementation of safety monitoring and warning system of toxic and flammable gas for municipal sewer pipe based on Nios-II and GPRS. In 2011 6th IEEE Joint International Information Technology and Artificial Intelligence Conference; 2011;Vol. 2, pp. 394-397. IEEE.
Słupek E, Makoś-Chełstowska P, Dobrzyniewski D, et al. Process control of biogas purification using electronic nose. Chemical Engineering Transactions; 2020;82, 427-432.
Ahmed WA, Aggour M, Naciri M. Biogas control: Methane production monitoring using Arduino. International Journal of Biotechnology and Bioengineering; 2017;11(2), 130-133.
Ferronato N, Torretta V. Waste mismanagement in developing countries: A review of global issues. International journal of environmental research and public health; 2019;16(6):1060.
Pandian I, Begum S, Kumaravel SP. An integrated IoT and fuzzy logic controller system for biogas digester to predict methane generation. Environment, Development and Sustainability; 2021;1-13.
Yang S, Svoronos SA, Pullammanappallil P. Development of Inexpensive, Automatic, Real-Time Measurement System for On-Line Methane Content and Biogas Flowrate. Waste and Biomass Valorization; 2022; 13(12), 4839-4849.
Corneli E, Dragoni F, Adessi A, et al. Energy conversion of biomass crops and agroindustrial residues by combined biohydrogen/biomethane system and anaerobic digestion. Bioresource technology.; 2016; 211, 509–518.
Wu N, Moreira CM, Zhang Y, et al. Techno-economic analysis of biogas production from microalgae through anaerobic digestion. Anaerobic Digestion; 2019; 1-33.
Wu N, Demchuk Z, Voronov A, et al. Sustainable manufacturing of polymeric materials: A techno-economic analysis of soybean oil-based acrylic monomers production. Journal of Cleaner Production; 2021; 286, 124939.
Zhang P. Biogas recovery from anaerobic digestion of selected industrial wastes. Advances in Biofuels and Bioenergy; 2018; 251-271.
Yang S, Liu Y, Wu N, et al. Low-cost, Arduino-based, portable device for measurement of methane composition in biogas. Renewable Energy; 2019; 138, 224-229.
IRENA. Global Energy Transformation: A Roadmap to 2050. International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA); 2018; Abu Dhabi.
Özcan MD, Özcan O, Kibar ME, et al. Preparation of Ni-CeO2/MgAl hydrotalcite-like catalyst for biogas oxidative steam reforming. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University; 2019; 34 (3): 1127-1141.
Abraham A, Mathew AK, Park H, et al. Pretreatment strategies for enhanced biogas production from lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource technology; 2020; 301: 1-13.
Savand-Roumi E, Salehiyoun AR, Mohtasebi SS. Use of a biogas-specific e-nose with machine learning to identify biogas pattern changes linked to hydraulic retention times in an anaerobic digester: A case study. Fuel; 2024; 357, 130013.
Theuerl S, Klang J, Prochnow A. Process disturbances in agricultural biogas production—Causes, mechanisms and effects on the biogas microbiome: A review. Energies; 2019;12(3), 365.
Theuerl S, Herrmann C, Heiermann M, et al. The future agricultural biogas plant in Germany: A vision. Energies; 2019; 12(3), 396.
Persson M, Jönsson O, Wellinger A. Biogas upgrading to vehicle fuel standards and grid injection. IEA Bioenergy task; 2006;Vol. 37, pp. 1-34.
Yentekakis IV, Goula G, Leone P, et al. Advanced utilization and management of biogas. Frontiers in Environmental Science; 2018; 6, 75.
EPA. Approved Pathways for Renewable Fuel 2023. https://www.epa.gov/renewable-fuel-standard-program/approved-pathways-renewable-fuel. Erişim tarihi: 10.11.2023.
Khoshnevisan B, Tsapekos P, Alvarado-Morales M, et al. Life cycle assessment of different strategies for energy and nutrient recovery from source sorted organic fraction of household waste. Journal of cleaner production; 2018; 180, 360-374.
Bolzonella D, Pavan P, Battistoni P, et al. Mesophilic anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge: influence of the solid retention time in the wastewater treatment process. Process Biochemistry; 2005; 40(3–4), 1453–1460.
Kim JK, Oh BR, Chun YN, et al. Effects of temperature and hydraulic retention time on anaerobic digestion of food waste. Journal of Bioscience and bioengineering; 2006; 102(4), 328-332.
Nagao N, Tajima N, Kawai M, et al. Maximum organic loading rate for the single-stage wet anaerobic digestion of food waste. Bioresource technology; 2012; 118, 210-218.
Lewis JJ, Hollingsworth JW, Chartier RT, et al. Biogas stoves reduce firewood use, household air pollution, and hospital visits in Odisha, India. Environmental science & technology; 2017; 51(1), 560-569.
Horiuchi JI, Shimizu T, Tada K, et al. Selective production of organic acids in anaerobic acid reactor by pH control. Bioresource technology; 2002; 82(3), 209–213.
Giuliano A, Bolzonella D, Pavan P, et al. Co-digestion of livestock effluents, energy crops and agro-waste: feeding and process optimization in mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. Bioresource technology; 2013; 128, 612-618.
Wellinger A, Murphy JD, Baxter D. The biogas handbook: science, production and applications. Elsevier; 2013.
Khanal SK, Chen WH, Li L, et al. Biological hydrogen production: effects of pH and intermediate products. International journal of hydrogen energy; 2004;29(11), 1123–1131.
Liu D, Zeng RJ, Angelidaki I. Effects of pH and hydraulic retention time on hydrogen production versus methanogenesis during anaerobic fermentation of organic household solid waste under extreme‐thermophilic temperature (70° C). Biotechnology and bioengineering; 2008;100(6), 1108-1114.
Drosg B. Process monitoring in biogas plants. Paris, France: IEA bioenergy; 2013. p. 1-38.
Pera AL, Sellaro M, Bianco M, et al. Effects of a temporary increase in OLR and a simultaneous decrease in HRT on dry anaerobic digestion of OFMSW. Environmental Technology; 2022;43(28), 4463-4471.
David B, Federico, B, Cristina C, et al. Biohythane production from food wastes. In Biohydrogen. Elsevier; 2019. p. 347-368.
Nkuna, R., Roopnarain, A., Rashama, C., Adeleke, R. Insights into organic loading rates of anaerobic digestion for biogas production: a review. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology; 2022;42(4), 487-507.
Song H, Zhang Y, Kusch-Brandt S, et al. Comparison of variable and constant loading for mesophilic food waste digestion in a long-term experiment. Energies; 2020;13(5), 1279.
Parajuli A, Khadka A, Sapkota L, et al. Effect of hydraulic retention time and organic-loading rate on two-staged, semi-continuous mesophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste during start-up. Fermentation; 2022;8(11), 620.
Jiang J, He S, Kang X, et al. Effect of organic loading rate and temperature on the anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste: process performance and energy recovery. Frontiers in Energy Research; 2020;8, 89.
Afridi ZUR, Qammar NW. Technical challenges and optimization of biogas plants. ChemBioEng Reviews; 2020;7(4), 119-129.
Ilangovan P, Begum MS, Srividhya PK. Development of online monitoring device and performance evaluation of biogas plants using enhanced methane prediction algorithm (EMPA). Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments; 2023;56, 103041.
Mittal S, Ahlgren EO, Shukla PR. Barriers to biogas dissemination in India: A review. Energy Policy; 2018;112, 361-370.
Manjusha C, Beevi BS. Mathematical modeling and simulation of anaerobic digestion of solid waste. Procedia Technology; 2016;24, 654-660.
Gupta A. Making biogas smart using internet of things (lot). In 2020 4th International Conference on Electronics, Materials Engineering & Nano-Technology (IEMENTech); 2020. p. 1-4. IEEE.
Polag D, May T, Müller L, et al. Online monitoring of stable carbon isotopes of methane in anaerobic digestion as a new tool for early warning of process instability. Bioresource technology; 2015;197, 161-170.
Lara-Cisneros G, Aguilar-López R, Femat R. On the dynamic optimization of methane production in anaerobic digestion via extremum-seeking control approach. Computers & Chemical Engineering; 2015;75, 49-59.
Ardali NR, Zarghami R, Gharebagh RS. Optimized Data Driven Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Chemical Processes. Computers & Chemical Engineering; 2024;108712.
Auffarth B. Machine Learning for Time-Series with Python: Forecast, predict, and detect anomalies with state-of-the-art machine learning methods. Packt Publishing Ltd.;2021.
Cinar S, Cinar SO, Wieczorek N, et al. Integration of artificial intelligence into biogas plant operation. Processes; 2021; 9(1), 85.
Cruz IA, Andrade LR, Bharagava RN, et al. An overview of process monitoring for anaerobic digestion. Biosystems Engineering; 2021;207, 106-119.
Pandyaswargo AH, Jagath Dickella Gamaralalage P, Liu C, et al. Challenges and an implementation framework for sustainable municipal organic waste management using biogas technology in emerging Asian Countries. Sustainability; 2019;11(22), 6331.
Jafari NH, Stark TD, Thalhamer T. Spatial and temporal characteristics of elevated temperatures in municipal solid waste landfills. Waste management; 2017; 59, 286-301.
Krause MJ, Chickering GW, et al. Effects of temperature and particle size on the biochemical methane potential of municipal solid waste components. Waste Management; 2018;71, 25-30.
Nelson DD, McManus B, Urbanski S, et al. High precision measurements of atmospheric nitrous oxide and methane using thermoelectrically cooled mid-infrared quantum cascade lasers and detectors. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy; 2004;60(14), 3325-3335.
Fisher R, Lowry D, Wilkin O, et al. High‐precision, automated stable isotope analysis of atmospheric methane and carbon dioxide using continuous‐flow isotope‐ratio mass spectrometry. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry: An International Journal Devoted to the Rapid Dissemination of Up‐to‐the‐Minute Research in Mass Spectrometry; 2006;20(2), 200-208.
Peng L, Ping L, Cai LA, et al. Design and implementation of safety monitoring and warning system of toxic and flammable gas for municipal sewer pipe based on Nios-II and GPRS. In 2011 6th IEEE Joint International Information Technology and Artificial Intelligence Conference; 2011;Vol. 2, pp. 394-397. IEEE.
Słupek E, Makoś-Chełstowska P, Dobrzyniewski D, et al. Process control of biogas purification using electronic nose. Chemical Engineering Transactions; 2020;82, 427-432.
Ahmed WA, Aggour M, Naciri M. Biogas control: Methane production monitoring using Arduino. International Journal of Biotechnology and Bioengineering; 2017;11(2), 130-133.
Sayfalar
215-228
Gelecek
13 Ocak 2025
Telif Hakkı (c) 2025 Akademisyen Yayınevi Kitap DOI Portalı