Dijital Ölçü Sistemleri ve Ağız İçi Tarayıcılar
Özet
Dental kliniklerde intraoral tarayıcıların kullanımı her geçen gün artmaktadır. Teknolojideki gelişmelerle birlikte yeni tarama teknolojileri geliştirilmekte ve piyasaya sürülen dental intraoral tarayıcıların sayısı da artmaktadır. Tarayıcıların maliyetlerinin fazla olması ve karşılaştırmak için bir araya getirilmesindeki zorluklar aynı çalışmada kullanılmalarını ve karşılaştırılmalarını zor hale getirdiğinden derleme çalışmalarına ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır.
Bu derlemenin amacı, diş hekimliğinde kullanılan dijital ölçü sistemleri ile ağız içi tarayıcılar hakkında bilgilendirme yapmaktır. Bu doğrultuda; Bilgisayar Destekli Tasarım/ Bilgisayar Destekli Üretim (CAD/CAM) sistemlerinin üretim sistemleri, tarayıcılar, tarayıcıların çalışma prensipleri, piyasada sıkça kullanılan tarayıcıların özellikleri, doğruluk ve hassasiyetleri ile ilgili bilgiler verilmiştir.
Sonuç olarak ağız içi tarayıcılar, çeşitli anatomik engeller karşısında yaşadığı problemler tam olarak aşılamamış olsa da hasta konforunu artıran, kullanımı giderek yaygınlaşan ve gelişen teknolojisiyle doğrulukları zamanla artan dijital ölçüde kullanılan cihazlardır.
Intraoral scanners are increasingly preferred in dental clinic applications. With advancements in technology, new scanning technologies are being developed, leading to a rise in the number of dental intraoral scanners entering the market. Challenges such as high costs of scanners and difficulties in standardizing and comparing them within the same study necessitate compilation studies.
The aim of this review is to provide information on currently used and newly produced devices, their operational principles, and their accuracy and precision based on existing literature studies. Accordingly, details on production systems of CAD/CAM systems, scanners, operational principles of scanners, features of commonly used scanners in the market, and comparative compilation studies found in the literature regarding their accuracy and precision are presented.
In conclusion, despite not entirely overcoming various anatomical barriers, intraoral scanners are devices that enhance patient comfort, are increasingly used, and with evolving technology, their accuracy in digital impressions continues to improve over time.
Referanslar
Wassell R, Barker D, Walls AW. Crowns and other extra-coronal restorations: impression materials and technique. British dental journal. 2002;192(12): 679-690. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.4801456
Sriram S, Shankari V, Chacko Y. Computer aided designing/computer aided manufacturing in dentistry (CAD/CAM)–A Review. International Journal of Current Research and Review. 2018;10(20): 20-24.
Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, et al. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dental materials journal. 2009;28(1): 44-56. doi:10.4012/dmj.28.44
Davidowitz G, Kotick PG, The use of CAD/CAM in dentistry. Dental Clinics. 2011;55(3): 559-570. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2011.02.011
Birnbaum NS, Aaronson HB, Stevens C, et al. 3D digital scanners: a high-tech approach to more accurate dental impressions. Inside Dentistry. 2009;5(4): 70-4.
Duret F, Termoz C. Method of and apparatus for making a prosthesis, especially a dental prosthesis. 1987, Google Patents.
Brandestini, M. and W.H. Moermann, Method and apparatus for the three-dimensional registration and display of prepared teeth. Google Patents; 1989.
Güth JF, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, et al. Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clinical oral investigations. 2013;17(4): 1201-1208. doi:10.1007/s00784-012-0795-0
Memari Y, Mohajerfar Armin A, et al. Marginal adaptation of CAD/CAM all‐ceramic crowns made by different impression methods: A literature review. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2019;28(2): 536-544. doi:10.1111/jopr.12800
Mangano F, Gandolfi A, Luongo G, et al. Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature. BMC oral health. 2017;17(1): 1-11. doi:10.1186/s12903-017-0442-x
Mehl A, Gloger W, Kunzelmann KH, et al. A new optical 3-D device for the detection of wear. Journal of dental research. 1997;76(11): 1799-1807. doi:10.1177/00220345970760111201
Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. British dental journal. 2008;204(9): 505-511. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.350
Uzun G. An overview of dental CAD/CAM systems. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment. 2008;22(1): 530-535. doi:10.1080/13102818.2008.10817506
Patzelt SB, Emmanouilidi A, Stampf S, et al. Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clinical oral investigations. 2014;18(6): 1687-1694.
Kim RJY, Park JM, and JS Shim. Accuracy of 9 intraoral scanners for complete-arch image acquisition: A qualitative and quantitative evaluation. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2018;120(6): 895-903. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.035
Richert R, Goujat A, Venet L, et al. Intraoral scanner technologies: a review to make a successful impression. Journal of Healthcare Engineering. 2017. doi:10.1155/2017/8427595
Taneva E, Kusnoto B, Evans CA, 3D scanning, imaging, and printing in orthodontics. Issues in contemporary orthodontics. 2015;148(5): 862-867. doi:10.5772/60010
Giménez B, Özcan M, Martinez F, et al. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active wavefront sampling technology for implants considering operator experience, implant angulation, and depth. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2015;17: 54-64. doi:10.1111/cid.12124
Logozzo S, Zanetti EM, Franceschini G, et al. Recent advances in dental optics–Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Optics and Lasers in Engineering. 2014;54: 203-221. doi:10.1016/j.optlaseng.2013.07.017
Pradíes G, Ferreiroa A, Özcan M, et al. Using stereophotogrammetric technology for obtaining intraoral digital impressions of implants. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2014;145(4): 338-344.
Atieh MA. Accuracy evaluation of intra-oral optical impressions: A novel approach. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 2016
Rekow ED. Dental CAD/CAM systems: a 20-year success story. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2006;137: 5-6. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0396
Schwotzer A. Measuring device and method that operates according to the basic principles of confocal microscopy. 2010. Google Patents.
Thiel F, Pfeiffer J, Fornoff P, Apparatus and method for optical 3D measurement. 2011. Google Patents.
CEREC Guide 3 and Dentsply Sirona Digital Implant Workflow [Online] https://assets.dentsplysirona.com/flagship/en/explore/cerec/cerec-implantology/CER-Brochure-CEREC-Guide-3-and-the-digital-implant-workflow-EN.pdf [Accessed:23rd October 2023]
Medina-Sotomayor P, Pascual-Moscardo A, Camps I. Accuracy of 4 digital scanning systems on prepared teeth digitally isolated from a complete dental arch. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2019;121(5): 811-820. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.08.020
Mangano FG, Hauschild U, Veronesi G, et al. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners in the impressions of single and multiple implants: a comparative in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1): 1-14. doi:10.1186/s12903-019-0792-7
CEREC AC with CEREC Omnicam Operating Instructions [Online] https://www.manualslib.com/manual/1603950/Dentsply-Sirona-Cerec-Omnicam-Ac.html [Accessed:16th November 2023]
Skramstad M. Welcome to Cerec Primescan AC Willkommen Cerec Primescan AC. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry. 2019;22(1): 69-78.
Primescan. [Online] https://www.dentsplysirona.com/en-gb/categories/digital-impression/primescan.html [Accessed:26th November 2023]
Mangano F, Lerner H, Margiani B, et al. Congruence between meshes and library files of implant scanbodies: an in vitro study comparing five intraoral scanners. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020;9(7): 2174. doi:10.3390/jcm9072174
Schmidt A, Klussmann L, Wöstmann B, et al. Accuracy of digital and conventional full-arch impressions in patients: an update. Journal of clinical medicine. 2020;9(3): 688. doi:10.3390/jcm9030688
Meer W J. Application of intra‐oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PLoS One 7 (2012): 1.
Galhano GÁP, Pellizzer EP, Mazaro JVQ. Optical impression systems for CAD-CAM restorations. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2012;23(6): 575-579.
Aswani K, Wankhade S, Khalikar A et al. Accuracy of an intraoral digital impression: A review. The Journal of the Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2020;20(1): 27. doi:10.4103/jips.jips_327_19
Garg AK. Cadent iTero's digital system for dental impressions: the end of trays and putty? Dental implantology update. 2008;19(1): 1-4.
Cadent debuts “next generation” iTero digital impression system. Implant Tribune. US ed. 2007;1(12):14.
Bakıç H, Kocacıklı M, Korkmaz T. Diş Hekimliğinde Güncel İntraoral Tarayicilar. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2021;31(2): 289-304. doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.713422
Logozzo S, Franceschini G, Kilpela A, et al. A comparative analysis of intraoral 3D digital scanners for restorative dentistry. Internet Journal of Medical Technology. 2011;5(1): 1-12.
Swapna B, Kamath V. Digital Impressions In Prosthodontics–An Overview. Journal of Critical Reviews. 2020:7(14): 733-735. doi:10.31838/jcr.07.14.132
Park JM, Shim JS. Optical impression in restorative dentistry. InComputer Vision in Dentistry. 2019 Feb 20. IntechOpen.
Planmeca [Online] https://publications.planmeca.com/Brochures/CAD_CAM/CADCAM_bro_en_low.pdf [Accessed: 18th December 2023]
Rotar RN, Jivanescu A, Ille C, et al. Trueness and precision of two intraoral scanners: a comparative in vitro study. Scanning. 2019 Oct 21;2019.
Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, et al. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. Journal of dentistry. 2010;38(7):553-559. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2010.03.015
Yun Z, Stegall DB, Scott SD, et al. 3M Innovative Properties Co, assignee. 3d image capture apparatus with depth of field extension. United States patent US 9,967,543. 2018 May 8.
Zimmermann M. Intraoral scanning systems: purchase decisions and system overview. Magyar Fogorvos. 2017;2017(1): 6-14. doi:10.5167/uzh-143306
Hack GD, Patzelt SB. Evaluation of the accuracy of six intraoral scanning devices: an in-vitro investigation. ADA Professional Product Review. 2015;10(4): 1-5.
Trios 4 [Online] https://www.3shape.com/en-us/scanners/trios-4 [Accessed: 28th December 2023]
Ting‐shu S, Jian S. Intraoral digital impression technique: a review. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2015;24(4): 313-321. doi:10.1111/jopr.12218
Imburgia M, Logozzo S, Hauschild U, et al. Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study. BMC oral health. 2017;17: 1-3. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0383-4
Nedelcu R, Olsson P, Nyström I, et al. Finish line distinctness and accuracy in 7 intraoral scanners versus conventional impression: an in vitro descriptive comparison. BMC oral health. 2018;18(1): 1-11.
3shape trios 4 intraoral scanner wins cellerant “best of class” award [Online] https://www.3shape.com/en/press/2019/3shape-trios-4-intraoralscanner-wins-cellerant-best-of-class-award. [Accessed: 2nd January 2024 ]
Institute of Digital Dentistry. Review of the intraoral scanners at ids 2019;19.
Trios 5 [Online] https://www.straumann.com/content/dam/mediacenter/digital/en/documents/brochure/product-information/490.811-en_low.pdf. [Accessed: 2nd January 2024 ]
Kim RJ, Benic GI, Park JM. Trueness of digital intraoral impression in reproducing multiple implant position. PloS one. 2019 Nov 19;14(11): e0222070.
Wong, V. and C. Fan, 3-D Scanner Calibration with Active Display Target Device. 2019, Google Patents.
CS 3800 [Online] https://universadent.com/product/carestream-cs-3800/. [Accessed: 8 January 2024 ]
Wu Q, Bin HU, Gong X, et al. Shenzhen University, assignee. Intra-oral scanner for digital impression and real-time reconstruction system for inner surface topographic image of oral cavity. 2015;United States patent US 9,149,348.
Bandiaky ON, Le Bars P, Gaudin A, et al. Comparative assessment of complete-coverage, fixed tooth-supported prostheses fabricated from digital scans or conventional impressions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2022;127(1): 71-79. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.017
Kong L, Li Y, Liu Z. Digital versus conventional full-arch impressions in linear and 3D accuracy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo studies. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2022;26(9): 5625-5642. doi:10.1007/s00784-022-04607-6
Chinam N, Bekkali M, Kallas M, et al. Virtual occlusal records acquired by using intraoral scanners: A review of factors that influence maxillo‐mandibular relationship accuracy. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2023;32(S2): 192-207. doi:10.1111/jopr.13787
Srivastava G, Padhiary SK, Mohanty N, Molinero-Mourelle P, Chebib N. Accuracy of Intraoral Scanner for Recording Completely Edentulous Arches—A Systematic Review. Dentistry journal. 2023;11(10): 241. doi:10.3390/dj11100241
Schmidt A, Wöstmann B, Schlenz MA. Accuracy of digital implant impressions in clinical studies: A systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2022;33(6): 573-585. doi:10.1111/clr.13951
Sriram S, Shankari V, Chacko Y. Computer aided designing/computer aided manufacturing in dentistry (CAD/CAM)–A Review. International Journal of Current Research and Review. 2018;10(20): 20-24.
Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, et al. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dental materials journal. 2009;28(1): 44-56. doi:10.4012/dmj.28.44
Davidowitz G, Kotick PG, The use of CAD/CAM in dentistry. Dental Clinics. 2011;55(3): 559-570. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2011.02.011
Birnbaum NS, Aaronson HB, Stevens C, et al. 3D digital scanners: a high-tech approach to more accurate dental impressions. Inside Dentistry. 2009;5(4): 70-4.
Duret F, Termoz C. Method of and apparatus for making a prosthesis, especially a dental prosthesis. 1987, Google Patents.
Brandestini, M. and W.H. Moermann, Method and apparatus for the three-dimensional registration and display of prepared teeth. Google Patents; 1989.
Güth JF, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, et al. Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clinical oral investigations. 2013;17(4): 1201-1208. doi:10.1007/s00784-012-0795-0
Memari Y, Mohajerfar Armin A, et al. Marginal adaptation of CAD/CAM all‐ceramic crowns made by different impression methods: A literature review. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2019;28(2): 536-544. doi:10.1111/jopr.12800
Mangano F, Gandolfi A, Luongo G, et al. Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature. BMC oral health. 2017;17(1): 1-11. doi:10.1186/s12903-017-0442-x
Mehl A, Gloger W, Kunzelmann KH, et al. A new optical 3-D device for the detection of wear. Journal of dental research. 1997;76(11): 1799-1807. doi:10.1177/00220345970760111201
Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. British dental journal. 2008;204(9): 505-511. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.350
Uzun G. An overview of dental CAD/CAM systems. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment. 2008;22(1): 530-535. doi:10.1080/13102818.2008.10817506
Patzelt SB, Emmanouilidi A, Stampf S, et al. Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clinical oral investigations. 2014;18(6): 1687-1694.
Kim RJY, Park JM, and JS Shim. Accuracy of 9 intraoral scanners for complete-arch image acquisition: A qualitative and quantitative evaluation. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2018;120(6): 895-903. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.035
Richert R, Goujat A, Venet L, et al. Intraoral scanner technologies: a review to make a successful impression. Journal of Healthcare Engineering. 2017. doi:10.1155/2017/8427595
Taneva E, Kusnoto B, Evans CA, 3D scanning, imaging, and printing in orthodontics. Issues in contemporary orthodontics. 2015;148(5): 862-867. doi:10.5772/60010
Giménez B, Özcan M, Martinez F, et al. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active wavefront sampling technology for implants considering operator experience, implant angulation, and depth. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2015;17: 54-64. doi:10.1111/cid.12124
Logozzo S, Zanetti EM, Franceschini G, et al. Recent advances in dental optics–Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Optics and Lasers in Engineering. 2014;54: 203-221. doi:10.1016/j.optlaseng.2013.07.017
Pradíes G, Ferreiroa A, Özcan M, et al. Using stereophotogrammetric technology for obtaining intraoral digital impressions of implants. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2014;145(4): 338-344.
Atieh MA. Accuracy evaluation of intra-oral optical impressions: A novel approach. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 2016
Rekow ED. Dental CAD/CAM systems: a 20-year success story. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2006;137: 5-6. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0396
Schwotzer A. Measuring device and method that operates according to the basic principles of confocal microscopy. 2010. Google Patents.
Thiel F, Pfeiffer J, Fornoff P, Apparatus and method for optical 3D measurement. 2011. Google Patents.
CEREC Guide 3 and Dentsply Sirona Digital Implant Workflow [Online] https://assets.dentsplysirona.com/flagship/en/explore/cerec/cerec-implantology/CER-Brochure-CEREC-Guide-3-and-the-digital-implant-workflow-EN.pdf [Accessed:23rd October 2023]
Medina-Sotomayor P, Pascual-Moscardo A, Camps I. Accuracy of 4 digital scanning systems on prepared teeth digitally isolated from a complete dental arch. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2019;121(5): 811-820. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.08.020
Mangano FG, Hauschild U, Veronesi G, et al. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners in the impressions of single and multiple implants: a comparative in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1): 1-14. doi:10.1186/s12903-019-0792-7
CEREC AC with CEREC Omnicam Operating Instructions [Online] https://www.manualslib.com/manual/1603950/Dentsply-Sirona-Cerec-Omnicam-Ac.html [Accessed:16th November 2023]
Skramstad M. Welcome to Cerec Primescan AC Willkommen Cerec Primescan AC. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry. 2019;22(1): 69-78.
Primescan. [Online] https://www.dentsplysirona.com/en-gb/categories/digital-impression/primescan.html [Accessed:26th November 2023]
Mangano F, Lerner H, Margiani B, et al. Congruence between meshes and library files of implant scanbodies: an in vitro study comparing five intraoral scanners. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020;9(7): 2174. doi:10.3390/jcm9072174
Schmidt A, Klussmann L, Wöstmann B, et al. Accuracy of digital and conventional full-arch impressions in patients: an update. Journal of clinical medicine. 2020;9(3): 688. doi:10.3390/jcm9030688
Meer W J. Application of intra‐oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PLoS One 7 (2012): 1.
Galhano GÁP, Pellizzer EP, Mazaro JVQ. Optical impression systems for CAD-CAM restorations. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2012;23(6): 575-579.
Aswani K, Wankhade S, Khalikar A et al. Accuracy of an intraoral digital impression: A review. The Journal of the Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2020;20(1): 27. doi:10.4103/jips.jips_327_19
Garg AK. Cadent iTero's digital system for dental impressions: the end of trays and putty? Dental implantology update. 2008;19(1): 1-4.
Cadent debuts “next generation” iTero digital impression system. Implant Tribune. US ed. 2007;1(12):14.
Bakıç H, Kocacıklı M, Korkmaz T. Diş Hekimliğinde Güncel İntraoral Tarayicilar. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2021;31(2): 289-304. doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.713422
Logozzo S, Franceschini G, Kilpela A, et al. A comparative analysis of intraoral 3D digital scanners for restorative dentistry. Internet Journal of Medical Technology. 2011;5(1): 1-12.
Swapna B, Kamath V. Digital Impressions In Prosthodontics–An Overview. Journal of Critical Reviews. 2020:7(14): 733-735. doi:10.31838/jcr.07.14.132
Park JM, Shim JS. Optical impression in restorative dentistry. InComputer Vision in Dentistry. 2019 Feb 20. IntechOpen.
Planmeca [Online] https://publications.planmeca.com/Brochures/CAD_CAM/CADCAM_bro_en_low.pdf [Accessed: 18th December 2023]
Rotar RN, Jivanescu A, Ille C, et al. Trueness and precision of two intraoral scanners: a comparative in vitro study. Scanning. 2019 Oct 21;2019.
Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, et al. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. Journal of dentistry. 2010;38(7):553-559. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2010.03.015
Yun Z, Stegall DB, Scott SD, et al. 3M Innovative Properties Co, assignee. 3d image capture apparatus with depth of field extension. United States patent US 9,967,543. 2018 May 8.
Zimmermann M. Intraoral scanning systems: purchase decisions and system overview. Magyar Fogorvos. 2017;2017(1): 6-14. doi:10.5167/uzh-143306
Hack GD, Patzelt SB. Evaluation of the accuracy of six intraoral scanning devices: an in-vitro investigation. ADA Professional Product Review. 2015;10(4): 1-5.
Trios 4 [Online] https://www.3shape.com/en-us/scanners/trios-4 [Accessed: 28th December 2023]
Ting‐shu S, Jian S. Intraoral digital impression technique: a review. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2015;24(4): 313-321. doi:10.1111/jopr.12218
Imburgia M, Logozzo S, Hauschild U, et al. Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study. BMC oral health. 2017;17: 1-3. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0383-4
Nedelcu R, Olsson P, Nyström I, et al. Finish line distinctness and accuracy in 7 intraoral scanners versus conventional impression: an in vitro descriptive comparison. BMC oral health. 2018;18(1): 1-11.
3shape trios 4 intraoral scanner wins cellerant “best of class” award [Online] https://www.3shape.com/en/press/2019/3shape-trios-4-intraoralscanner-wins-cellerant-best-of-class-award. [Accessed: 2nd January 2024 ]
Institute of Digital Dentistry. Review of the intraoral scanners at ids 2019;19.
Trios 5 [Online] https://www.straumann.com/content/dam/mediacenter/digital/en/documents/brochure/product-information/490.811-en_low.pdf. [Accessed: 2nd January 2024 ]
Kim RJ, Benic GI, Park JM. Trueness of digital intraoral impression in reproducing multiple implant position. PloS one. 2019 Nov 19;14(11): e0222070.
Wong, V. and C. Fan, 3-D Scanner Calibration with Active Display Target Device. 2019, Google Patents.
CS 3800 [Online] https://universadent.com/product/carestream-cs-3800/. [Accessed: 8 January 2024 ]
Wu Q, Bin HU, Gong X, et al. Shenzhen University, assignee. Intra-oral scanner for digital impression and real-time reconstruction system for inner surface topographic image of oral cavity. 2015;United States patent US 9,149,348.
Bandiaky ON, Le Bars P, Gaudin A, et al. Comparative assessment of complete-coverage, fixed tooth-supported prostheses fabricated from digital scans or conventional impressions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2022;127(1): 71-79. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.017
Kong L, Li Y, Liu Z. Digital versus conventional full-arch impressions in linear and 3D accuracy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo studies. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2022;26(9): 5625-5642. doi:10.1007/s00784-022-04607-6
Chinam N, Bekkali M, Kallas M, et al. Virtual occlusal records acquired by using intraoral scanners: A review of factors that influence maxillo‐mandibular relationship accuracy. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2023;32(S2): 192-207. doi:10.1111/jopr.13787
Srivastava G, Padhiary SK, Mohanty N, Molinero-Mourelle P, Chebib N. Accuracy of Intraoral Scanner for Recording Completely Edentulous Arches—A Systematic Review. Dentistry journal. 2023;11(10): 241. doi:10.3390/dj11100241
Schmidt A, Wöstmann B, Schlenz MA. Accuracy of digital implant impressions in clinical studies: A systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2022;33(6): 573-585. doi:10.1111/clr.13951
Sayfalar
1-16
Gelecek
30 Nisan 2024
Telif Hakkı (c) 2024 Akademisyen Yayınevi Kitap Portalı
Lisans
LisansNasıl Atıf Yapılır
1.
Yeşil Z, Kaya N. Dijital Ölçü Sistemleri ve Ağız İçi Tarayıcılar. Içinde: Kesim B, editör. Güncel Protetik Diş Tedavisi Çalışmaları VI (Bahar) [Internet]. Türkiye: Akademisyen Yayınevi Kitap DOI Portalı; 2024 [a.yer 13 Temmuz 2026]. ss. 1-16. Erişim adresi: https://www.omp35.books.akademisyen.net/index.php/akya/catalog/book/3057/chapter/13604
