Biyogaz Üretiminde Süreç Yönetimi

European Environment Agency. Trends and drivers of EU greenhouse gas emissions. (2020) doi:10.2800/19800.

Mossberg, J., Pettersson, K., Furusjö, E., Baky, A. & Klintbom, P. Perspektiv på svenska förnybara drivmedel - Utvärdering utifrån miljökvalitets- och samhällsmål samt scenarier för inhemsk produktion till 2030. (2019).

Prussi, M., Yugo, M., De Prada, L., Padella, M. & Edwards, M. JEC Well-To-Wheels report v5. (2020). doi:10.2760/100379.

Gustafsson, M., Cruz, I., Svensson, N. & Karlsson, M. Scenarios for upgrading and distribution of compressed and liquefied biogas — Energy, environmental, and economic analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production 256, 120473 (2020).

Tybirk, K. Biogas Liquefaction and use of Liquid Biomethane. Status on the market and technologies available for LNG/LBG/LBM of relevance for biogas actors in 2017. (2018).

IRENA. Biogas for Road Vehicles: Technology brief. (2018).

Dahlgren, S. Biogas-based fuels as renewable energy in the transport sector: an overview of the potential of using CBG, LBG and other vehicle fuels produced from biogas. Biofuels 1–13 (2020) doi:10.1080/17597269.2020.1821571.

Wormslev, E. C. & Broberg, M. K. Sustainable Jet Fuel for Aviation – Nordic perspectives on the use of advanced sustainable jet fuel for aviation. www.niras.dk (2020).

Calderón, C., Colla, M. & Jossart, J.-M. Statistical report 2020 - Report biogas. Bioenergy Europe https://www.europeanbiogas.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Biogas-Report-2020-EBA-Bioenergy-Europe.pdf (2020).

EBA. European Biogas Association Statistical Report: 2019 European Overview. European Biogas Association http://european-biogas.eu/2017/12/14/eba-statistical-report-2017-published-soon/ (2020).

WBA. Global Bioenergy Statistics 2019 World Bioenergy Association. World Bioenergy Association (WBA) 58 (2019).

Wellinger, A., Murphy, J. & Baxter, D. The biogas handbook. The biogas handbook (2013). doi:10.1533/9780857097415.

Patinvoh, R. J., Osadolor, O. A., Chandolias, K., Sárvári Horváth, I. & Taherzadeh, M. J. Innovative pretreatment strategies for biogas production. Bioresource Technology 224, 13–24 (2017).

Luostarinen, S. Energy Potential of Manure in the Baltic Sea Region: Biogas Potential & Incentives and Barriers for Implementation. 77 (2013).

Meyer, A. K. P., Ehimen, E. A. & Holm-Nielsen, J. B. Future European biogas: Animal manure, straw and grass potentials for a sustainable European biogas production. Biomass and Bioenergy 111, 154–164 (2018).

Liu, T. Biogas production from lignocellulosic agricultural residues Microbial approaches for enhanced efficiency. (2019).

Hagman, L., Blumenthal, A., Eklund, M. & Svensson, N. The role of biogas solutions in sustainable biorefineries. Journal of Cleaner Production 172, 3982–3989 (2018).

Mirata, M., Eklund, M. & Gundberg, A. Industrial symbiosis and biofuels industry: business value and organisational factors within cases of ethanol and biogas production. The Swedish Knowledge Centre for Renewable Transportation Fuels www.f3centre.se (2017).

Cesaro, A. & Belgiorno, V. Combined biogas and bioethanol production: Opportunities and challenges for industrial application. Energies 8, 8121–8144 (2015).

Meyer, T. & Edwards, E. A. Anaerobic digestion of pulp and paper mill wastewater and sludge. Water Research 65, 321–349 (2014).

Ekstrand, E.-M. Anaerobic digestion in kraft pulp and paper industry – challenges and possibilities for implementation. (Linköping University, 2019).

Kamali, M., Gameiro, T., Costa, M. E. V. & Capela, I. Anaerobic digestion of pulp and paper mill wastes - An overview of the developments and improvement opportunities. Chemical Engineering Journal 298, 162–182 (2016).

Sawatdeenarunat, C. et al. Biogas production from industrial effluents. in Biomass, Biofuels, Biochemicals: Biofuels: Alternative Feedstocks and Conversion Processes for the Production of Liquid and Gaseous Biofuels 779–816 (Elsevier, 2019). doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-816856-1.00032-4.

Lin, Y. C., Ni, C. H., Wu, C. Y. & Lin, J. C. Te. A full-scale study of external circulation sludge bed (ECSB) system for anaerobic wastewater treatment in a whiskey distillery. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26, 34261–34276 (2019).

Li, W.-W. & Yu, H.-Q. Advances in Energy-Producing Anaerobic Biotechnologies for Municipal Wastewater Treatment. Engineering 2, 438–446 (2016).

Stazi, V. & Tomei, M. C. Enhancing anaerobic treatment of domestic wastewater: State of the art, innovative technologies and future perspectives. Science of the Total Environment 635, 78–91 (2018).

Zhang, L. et al. Anaerobic treatment of raw domestic wastewater in a UASB-digester at 10 °C and microbial community dynamics. Chemical Engineering Journal 334, 2088–2097 (2018).

Schnürer, A. & Jarvis, Å. Microbiology of the biogas process. (2018).

Ghavinati, H. & Tabatabaei, M. Biogas: Fundamentals, Process, and Operation. Springer (2018).

Atelge, M. R. et al. A critical review of pretreatment technologies to enhance anaerobic digestion and energy recovery. Fuel 270, 117494 (2020).

Edström, M., Nordberg, Å. & Thyselius, L. Anaerobic treatment of animal byproducts from slaughterhouses at laboratory and pilot scale. in Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology - Part A Enzyme Engineering and Biotechnology vol. 109 127–138 (Springer, 2003).

Zhang, Y., Kusch-Brandt, S., Heaven, S. & Banks, C. J. Effect of pasteurisation on methane yield from food waste and other substrates in anaerobic digestion. Processes 8, 1–22 (2020).

Ware, A. & Power, N. What is the effect of mandatory p asteurisation o n t he b iogas t ransformation of solid slaughterhouse wastes? Waste Management 48, 503–512 (2016).

Carlsson, M . W hen a nd w hy is p re-treatment o f s ubstrates for anaerobic digestion useful? Doctoral thesis / Luleå University of Technology 1 jan 1997 → (2015).

Hernández-Beltrán, J. U. et al. Insight into Pretreatment Methods of Lignocellulosic. Applied Sciences (2019).

Westerholm, M. & Schnürer, A. Microbial Responses to Different Operating Practices for Biogas Production Systems. İn Anaerobic Digestion (IntechOpen, 2019). doi:10.5772/intechopen.82815.

Xu, F., Li, Y., Ge, X., Yang, L. & Li, Y. Anaerobic digestion of food waste – Challenges and opportunities. Bioresource Technology 247, 1047–1058 (2018).

Van Lier, J. B., Vashi, A., Van Der Lubbe, J. & Heffernan, B. Anaerobic sewage treatment using UASB reactors: Engineering and operational aspects. in Environmental Anaerobic Technology: Applications and New Developments 59–89 (Imperial College Press, 2010). doi:10.1142/9781848165434_0004.

Kong, Z., Li, L., Xue, Y., Yang, M. & Li, Y. Y. Challenges and prospects for the anaerobic treatment of chemicalindustrial organic wastewater: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production 231, 913–927 (2019).

Camirand, E. Biogas Plant Development Handbook • BiogasWorld. https://www.biogasworld.com/biogas-plantdevelopment-handbook/.

SGC. Basic Data on Biogas. www.sgc.se. (2012).

Li, Y., Park, S. Y. & Zhu, J. Solid-state anaerobic digestion for methane production from organic waste. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews vol. 15 821–826 (2011).

Brown, D. & Li, Y. Solid state anaerobic co-digestion of yard waste and food waste for biogas production. Bioresource Technology 127, 275–280 (2013).

Kothari, R., Pandey, A. K., Kumar, S., Tyagi, V. V. & Tyagi, S. K. Different aspects of dry anaerobic digestion for bioenergy: An overview. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 39, 174–195 (2014).

Waltenberger, R. & Kirchmayr, R. Wet and Dry Anaerobic Digestion Processes. Jyväskylä Summerschool (2013).

Fu, Y. et al. Dry anaerobic digestion technologies for agricultural straw and acceptability in China. Sustainability (Switzerland) 10, (2018).

Persson, E., Westerholm, M., Schnürer, A., Nordin, A. & Tamm, D. Dry anaerobic digestion of food waste at mesophilic and thermophilic temperature. REPORT 201 www.energiforsk.se (2019).

Chiumenti, A., da Borso, F. & Limina, S. Dry anaerobic digestion of cow manure and agricultural products in a full-scale plant: Efficiency and comparison with wet fermentation. Waste Management 71, 704–710 (2018).

Rocamora, I. et a l. Dry anaerobic digestion of organic waste: A review of operational parameters and their impact on process performance. Bioresource Technology 299, 122681 (2020).

Kashyap, D. R., Dadhich, K. S. & Sharma, S. K. Biomethanation under psychrophilic conditions: A review. Bioresource Technology 87, 147–153 (2003).

Dev, S. et al. Perspective on anaerobic digestion for biomethanation in cold environments. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 103, 85–95 (2019).

Massé, D . I ., R ajagopal, R. & Singh, G. Technical a nd operational feasibility of psychrophilic anaerobic digestion biotechnology for processing ammonia-rich waste. Applied Energy 120, 49–55 (2014).

Van, D. P., Fujiwara, T., Tho, B. L., Toan, P. P. S. & M inh, G. H. A review of anaerobic digestion systems for biodegradable waste: Configurations, operating parameters, and current trends. Environmental Engineering Research 25, 1–17 (2020).

Nizami, A. S. & Murphy, J. D. What type of digester configurations should be employed to produce biomethane from grass silage? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14, 1558–1568 (2010).

Jimenez, J. et al. Instrumentation and control of anaerobic digestion processes: a review and some research challenges. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology 14, 615–648 (2015).

Vilanova Plana, P . & N oche, B . A r eview o f t he c urrent digestate distribution models: storage and transport. WIT Transactions on Ecology and The Environment 202, (2016).

Le Corre, K. S., Valsami-Jones, E., Hobbs, P. & Parsons, S. A. Phosphorus Recovery from Wastewater by Struvite Crystallization: A Review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 39, 433–477 (2009).

Tao, W., Fattah, K. P. & Huchzermeier, M. P. Struvite recovery from anaerobically digested dairy manure: A review of application potential and hindrances. Journal of Environmental Management 169, 46–57 (2016).

Lorick, D., Macura, B., Ahlström, M., Grimvall, A. & Harder, R. Effectiveness of struvite precipitation and ammonia stripping for recovery of phosphorus and nitrogen from anaerobic digestate: a systematic review. Environmental Evidence 9, 1–20 (2020).

Drosg, B., Fuchs, W., Al Seadi, T., Madsen, M. & Linke, B. Nutrient Recovery by Biogas Digestate Processing. IEA Bioenergy http://www.iea-biogas.net/files/daten-redaktion/download/TechnicalBrochures/NUTRIENT_RECOVERY_RZ_web1.pdf (2015).

Fuchs, W. & Drosg, B. Assessment of the state of the art of technologies for the processing of digestate residue from anaerobic digesters. Water Science and Technology 67, 1984–1993 (2013).

Boe, K., Karakashev, D., Trably, E. & Angelidaki, I. Effect of post-digestion temperature on serial CSTR biogas reactor performance. Water Research 43, 669–676 (2009).

Huygens, D. et al. Technical proposals for the safe use of processed manure above the threshold established for Nitrate Vulnerable Zones by the Nitrates Directive ( 91 / 676 / EEC ). EUR 30363 (2020).

Hoyer, K., Hulteberg, C., Svensson, M., And, J. J. & Nørregård, Ø. Biogas Upgrading-Technical Review. REPORT 201 www.energiforsk.se (2016).

Bauer, F., Hulteberg, C., Persson, T. & Tamm, D. Biogas upgrading – Review of commercial technologies. SGC Rappor (2013).

Kapoor, R., Ghosh, P., Kumar, M. & Vijay, V. K. Evaluation of biogas upgrading technologies and future perspectives: a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26, 11631–11661 (2019).

Ryckebosch, E., Drouillon, M. & Vervaeren, H. Techniques for transformation of biogas to biomethane. Biomass and Bioenergy vol. 35 1633–1645 (2011).

Guebitz, G. M., Bauer, A., Bochmann, G., Gronauer, A. & Weiss, S. Biogas Science and Technology. Biogas Science and Technology (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21993-6.

Angelidaki, I. et al. Biogas upgrading and utilization: Current status and perspectives. Biotechnology Advances 36, 452– 466 (2018).

Adnan, Ong, Nomanbhay, Chew & Show. Technologies for Biogas Upgrading to Biomethane: A Review. Bioengineering 6, 92 (2019).

Salman, C. A., Schwede, S., Thorin, E. & Yan, J. Enhancing biomethane production by integrating pyrolysis and anaerobic digestion processes. Applied Energy 204, 1074–1083 (2017).

Surendra, K. C., Sawatdeenarunat, C., Shrestha, S., Sung, S. & Khanal, S. K. Anaerobic digestion-based biorefinery for bioenergy and biobased products. Industrial Biotechnology 11, 103–112 (2015).

Righetti, E., Nortilli, S., Fatone, F., Frison, N. & Bolzonella, D. A Multiproduct Biorefinery Approach for the Production of Hydrogen, Methane and Volatile Fatty Acids from Agricultural Waste. Waste and Biomass Valorization 11, 5239–5246 (2020).

IRENA. Bioenergy from Finnish forests: Sustainable, efficient and modern use of wood. www.irena.org (2018).

Moraes, B. S. et al. Anaerobic digestion of vinasse from sugarcane biorefineries in Brazil from energy, environmental, and economic perspectives: Profit or expense? Applied Energy 113, 825–835 (2014).

Broberg Viklund, S. & Lindkvist, E. Biogas production supported by excess heat - A systems analysis within the food industry. Energy Conversion and Management 91, 249–258 (2015).

Pierie, F. et al. Improving the Sustainability of Farming Practices through the Use of a Symbiotic Approach for Anaerobic Digestion and Digestate Processing. Resources 6, 50 (2017).

Bernadette McCabe, Roland Kroebe, Marco Pezzaglia, Clare Lukehurst & Jerry D. Murphy. Integration of Anaerobic Digestion into Farming Systems in Australia, Canada, Italy, and the UK. 8 (2020).

Heaven, S., Salter, A. M. & Banks, C. J. Integration of on-farm biodiesel production with anaerobic digestion to maximise energy yield and greenhouse gas savings from process and farm residues. Bioresource Technology 102, 7784–7793 (2011).

Havukainen, J., Uusitalo, V., Niskanen, A., Kapustina, V. & Horttanainen, M. Evaluation of methods for estimating energy performance of biogas production. Renewable Energy 66, 232–240 (2014).

Pöschl, M ., W ard, S. & Owende, P . E valuation o f e nergy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways. Applied Energy 87, 3305–3321 (2010).

Lombardi, L., Mendecka, B. & Fabrizi, S. Solar Integrated Anaerobic Digester: Energy Savings and Economics. Energies 13, 4292 (2020).

Ouhammou, B. et al. A new system design and analysis of a solar bio-digester unit. Energy Conversion and Management 198, 111779 (2019).

Zhang, X., Yan, J., Li, H., Chekani, S. & Liu, L. Investigation of thermal integration between biogas production and upgrading. Energy Conversion and Management 102, 131–139 (2015).

Zhen, F., Zhang, J., Li, W., Sun, Y. & Kong, X. Optimizing Waste Heat Utilization in Vehicle Bio-Methane Plants. Energies 11, 1518 (2018).

Merlin, G., Kohler, F., Bouvier, M., Lissolo, T. & Boileau, H. Importance of heat transfer in an anaerobic digestion plant in a continental climate context. Bioresource Technology 124, 59–67 (2012).

Han, R. et al. Review on heat-utilization processes and heat-exchange equipment in biogas engineering. Citation: Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy 8, 32701 (2016).

Chen, J., Wu, J., Ji, X., Lu, X. & Wang, C. Mechanism of waste-heat recovery from slurry by scraped-surface heat exchanger. Applied Energy 207, 146–155 (2017).

Chen, J. et al. A high efficient heat exchanger with twisted geometries for biogas process with manure slurry. Applied Energy 279, 115871 (2020).

Parsons, S. A. & Doyle, J. D. Struvite scale formation and control. Water Science and Technology 49, 177–182 (2004).

Doyle, J. D. & Parsons, S. A. Struvite formation, control and recovery. Water Research 36, 3925–3940 (2002).

Karlsson, E. (2021). Biogas through Anaerobic Digestion from Waste Streams as a Renewable Transportation Fuel – A Brief Review of Technology. ETIP Bioenergy, European Technology and Innovation Platform.

Cedigaz (2019). Global biomethane market: Green gas goes global.

IEA. (2020a). Outlook for biogas and Prospects for organic growth. World Energy Outlook Special Report. IEA Publications International Energy Agency.

IEA. (2020b). Advanced Biofuels – Potential for Cost Reduction. IEA Bioenergy.

Öztürk, H.H. (2020). Biyogaz ve Biyometan: Üretim-Tüketim ve Maliyetler. LAMBERT Academic Publishing, ISBN: 978-620-2-52079-9.

Öztürk, H.H., Türker, G., Mutlu, N. (2020). Tarımsal Biyogaz Tesisleri: Teknik-Ekonomik ve Çevresel Değerlendirmeler. LAMBERT Academic Publishing, ISBN: 978-620-2-52079-9.

Türker, G. (2020). Organik Atıklardan Biyogaz Üretimi: Biyogaz Teknolojisi. LAMBERT Academic Publishing, ISBN: 978-620-0-78766-6.

Pierie F., Dsouza A., van Someren CEJ, Benders RMJ, van Gemert WJT, Moll HC. Improving t he Sustainability of Farming Practices through the Use of a Symbiotic Approach for Anaerobic Digestion and Digestate Processing, Resources 2017, 6, 50; doi:10.3390/resources6040050.

Vatn, A.; Bakken, L.; Bleken, M.A.; Baadshaug, O.H.; Fykse, H.; Haugen, L.E.; Lundekvam, H.; Morken, J.; Romstad, E.; Rørstad, P.K.; et al. A methodology for integrated economic and environmental analysis of pollution from agriculture. Agric. Syst. 2006, 88, 270–293.

Öztürk, H.H., 2016. Biyoyakıt Üretimi. Umuttepe Yayınevi, 390 sayfa.

Taşyürek, M., Acaroğlu, M., 2007. Biyoyakıtlarda (biyomotorinde) emisyon azatlımı ve küresel ısınmaya etkisi. Uluslararası Küresel İklim Değişikliği ve Çevresel Etkileri Konferansı, Konya.

IEA, 2021. INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY Net Zero by 2050 A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector. Net Zero by 2050 Interactive.

IEA, 2020. Sustainable Recovery. International Energy Agency World Energy Outlook Special Report in collaboration with the International Monetary Fund.

Atwell, R., 2016. Task force’s work on waste management left out of plan

Calderón, C. et al., 2019. Report Biogas, Brussels: Bioenergy Europe.

EBA (European Biogas Association) (2019). Statistical Report.

Flach, B., Lieberz, S., Lappin, J. & Bolla, S., 2018. EU Biofuels Annual 2018,

IEA. (2020a). Outlook for biogas and Prospects for organic growth

World Energy Outlook Special Report. IEA Publications International Energy Agency.

IEA. (2020b). Advanced Biofuels – Potential for Cost Reduction. IEA Bioenergy.

Landälv, I., 2017. Methanol as a Renewable Fuel - A Knowledge Synthesis, s.l.: f3 The Swedish Knowledge Centre for Renewable Transportation Fuels.

NESTE, 2019. Biodiesel prices (SME & FAME).

Öztürk, H.H. (2020). Biyogaz ve Biyometan: Üretim-Tüketim ve Maliyetler. LAMBERT Academic Publishing, ISBN: 978-620-2-52079-9.

Öztürk, H.H., Türker, G., Mutlu, N. (2020). Tarımsal Biyogaz Tesisleri: Teknik-Ekonomik ve Çevresel Değerlendirmeler. LAMBERT Academic Publishing, ISBN: 978-620-2-52079-9.

Türker, G. (2020). Organik Atıklardan Biyogaz Üretimi: Biyogaz Teknolojisi. LAMBERT Academic Publishing, ISBN: 978-620-0-78766-6.

Azar, C. 2011. Biomass for energy – a dream come true or a nightmare? WIREs Climate Change, DOI 10.1002/wcc.109, John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

Boody, G., B. Vondracek, D.A. Andow, M. Krinke, J. Westra, J. Zimmerman & P. Welle. 2005. Multifunctional Agriculture in the United States. Bioscience, 55: 27-38.

Chen, G., C. R. Hooks, M. Lekveishvili, K. H. Wang, K. H., N. Pradhan, S. Tubene, S., R. R. Weil, and R. Ogutu. 2015. Cover C rop a nd T illage I mpact o n S oil Q uality, G reenhouse Gas Emission, Pests, and Economics of Fields Transitioning to Organic Farming. Final report for project ORG 2011-04944.

DECC, 2010. 2050 pathways analysis, Department of Energy and Climate Change, UK. 245 pages.

FAO, 2009c. Small scale bioenergy initiatives – brief description and preliminary lessons on livelihood impacts from case studies in Asia, Latin America and Africa. Policy Innovation Systems for Clean Energy Security (PISCES), Practical Action, and FAO, Environment and Natural Resources Management working paper 31, 149 pages. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

GoS, 2011. Foresight project on global food and farming futures, Synthesis Report C12: Meeting the challenges of a low-emissions world, UK Government Offi ce for Science, London.

IPCC, 2011a. Special report on renewable energy and climate change mitigation, Working Group III, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

IPCC, 2011b. Special report on renewable energy and climate change mitigation, Chapter 9, Sustainable Development, Working Group III, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

IPCC, 2011c. Special report on renewable energy and climate change mitigation, Chapter 8, Integration of Renewable Energy into Present and Future Energy Systems, Working Group III, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

IPCC, 2011d. Special report on renewable energy and climate change mitigation, Chapter 2 Bioenergy, Working Group III, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

IPCC, 2011e. Special report on renewable energy and climate change mitigation, Chapter 11, Policy, Financing and Implementation, Working Group III, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Haspel, T. 2019. “Can perennial grains solve the carbon-storage problem?” The Washington Post, February 5, 2019.

Kosicki, M. K. Tomberg and A. Bradley, 2018. Repair of CRISPR-Cas9–induced double-stranded breaks leads to large deletions and complex rearrangements. Nature Biotechnology, 36:675-771. DOI: 10.1038/Nbt.4192.

Landis, D., M.M. Gardiner, W. van der Werf & S.M. Swinton. 2008. Increasing Corn for Biofuel Production Reduces Biocontrol Services in Agricultural Landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105: 20552- 20557.

Obrycki et al., 2018. Corn stover harvest, tillage and cover crop effects on soil health indicators. Soil and Water Manag. and Conservation. 82, 910-918.

Qin et al., 2016. Influence of spatially dependent, modeled soil carbon emission factors on life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of corn and cellulosic ethanol. Global Change Biology and Bioenergy, 8,1136-1149.

Pimentel D, Marklein A, Toth M A, Karpoff M N, Oaul G S, McCormick R, Kyriazis J and Krueger T, 2009. Food versus fuels –environmental and economic costs, Human Ecology, Springer, DOI 10.1007/ s10745-009-9215-8

REN21, 2011. Renewables 2011 Global Status Report, Renewable Energy for the 21st Century, Paris.

Royo-Esnal, A., and F. Valencia-Gredilla, 2018. Camelina as a rotation crop for weed control in organic farming in semiarid Mediterranean climate. Agriculture, 8, 156.

SER, 2011. Farmers flock to invest in renewable energy schemes, Sustainable Energy Review, 5 September.

Tilman D., J. Hill and C. Lehman. 2006. Carbon-Negative Biofuels from Low-Input High-Diversity Grassland Biomass. Science 314: 1598-1600; Fargione, J., J. Hill, D. Tilman, S. Polasky & P. Hawthorne. 2008. Land Clearing and the Biofuel Debt. Science, 319, 1235- 1237

Wolfe, B. E., and J. N. Klironomos. 2005. Breaking new ground: soil communities and exotic plant invasion. BioScience, 55(6), 477-487.

Pramanik, S.K.; Suja, F.B.; Zain, S.M.; Pramanik, B.K. The anaerobic digestion process of biogas production from food waste: Prospects and constraints. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2019, 8, 100310.

FAOSTAT. Emissions Due to Agriculture. Global, Regional and Country Trends 1990–2018; Analytical Brief 182020; ISSN 2709-0078.

Thompson, E.; Wang, Q.; Li, M. Anaerobic digester systems (ADS) for multiple dairy farms: A GIS analysis for optimal site selection. Energy Policy 2013, 61, 114–124.

Gerardi, M.H. Nitrification and Denitrification in the Activated Sludge Process; Wastewater Microbiology SERIES; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2003.

VDI (2006) 4630 INGENIEURE. In Fermentation of Organic Materials: Characterisation of the Substrate, Sampling, Collection of Material Data, Fermentation Tests; Verlag des Vereins Deutscher Ingenieure: Düsseldorf, Germany, 2006.

Cecchi, F.; Battistoni, P.; Pavan, P.; Bolzanella, D.; Innocenti, L. Digestione Anaerobica Della Frazione Organica dei Rifiuti Solidi; APAT: Rome, Italy, 2005; p. 178.

Chen, Y.; Jay, J.; Cheng, J.J.; Creamer, K.S. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 4044–4064.

Abouelenien, F.; Namba, Y.; Kosseva, M.R.; Nishio, N.; Nakashimada, Y. Enhancement of methane production from co-digestion of chicken manure with agricultural wastes. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 159, 80–87.

Khalid, A.; Arshad, M.; Anjum, M.; Mahmood, T.; Dawson, L. The anaerobic digestion of solid organic waste. Waste Manag. 2011, 31, 1737–1744.

Panigrahi, S.; Dubey, B.K. A critical review on operating parameters and strategies to improve the biogas yield from anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Renew. Energy 2019, 143, 779–797.

Adekunle, K.F.; Okolie, J.A. A Review of Biochemical Process of Anaerobic Digestion. Adv. Biosci. Biotechnol. 2015, 6, 205–212.

Gourdon, R.; Vermande, P. Effects of Propionic Acid Concentration on Anaerobic Digestion of Pig Manure. Biomass 1987, 13, 1–12.

Visser, A. The Anaerobic Treatment of Sulfate Containing Wastewater. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1995; p. 157

Adani, F.; Schievano, A.; D’Imporzano, G. I Fattori che Rendono Ottimale la Razione per il Digestore; L’Informatore Agrario: Verona, Italy, 2008; Volume 40, pp. 19–24.

Speece, R.E. Anaerobic biotechnology for industrial wastewater treatment a description of several installations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1983, 17, 416A–427A.

Vijayakumar, P.; Ayyadurai, S.; Arunachalam, K.D.; Mishra, G.; Chen, W.-H.; Juan, J.C.; Naqvi, S.R. Current technologies of biochemical conversion of food waste into biogas production: A review. Fuel 2022, 323, 124321.

Couturier C. Techniques de production d’´electricit´e a ` partir de biogaz et de gaz de synth`ese. 2009.

Dahunsi, S. Mechanical pretreatment of lignocelluloses for enhanced biogas production: Methane yield prediction from biomass structural components. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 280, 18–26.

Atelge, M.R.; Atabani, A.E.; Banu, J.R.; Krisa, D.; Kaya, M.; Eskicioglu, C.; Kumar, G.; Lee, C.; Yildiz, Y.Ş.; Unalan, S.; et al. A critical review of pretreatment technologies to enhance anaerobic digestion and energy recovery. Fuel 2020, 270, 117494.

Qiao, Z.; Xu, S.; Zhang, W.; Shi, S.; Zhang, W.; Liu, H. Potassium ferrate pretreatment promotes short chain fatty acids yield and antibiotics reduction in acidogenic fermentation of sewage sludge. J. Environ. Sci. 2022, 120, 41–52.

Zerrouki, S.; Rihani, R.; Lekikot, K.; Ramdhane, I. Enhanced biogas production from anaerobic digestion of wastewater from the fruit juice industry by sonolysis: Experiments and modelling. Water Sci. Technol. 2021, 84, 644–655.

Oleszek, M.; Krzemińska, I. Biogas production from high-protein and rigid cell wall microalgal biomasses: Ultrasonication and FT-IR evaluation of pretreatment effects. Fuel 2021, 296, 120676.

Sambusiti C, Monlau F, Ficara E, Musatti A, Rollini M, Barakat A, Malpei F. Comparison of various post-treatments for recovering methane from agricultural digestate. Fuel Process Technol 2015;137:359–65.

Bremond, U,; Bertrandias, A.; Buyer, R.; Latrille, E.; Jimenez, J.; Escudi , R.; Steyer, J.P.; Bernet, N.; Carrere Recirculation of solid digestate to enhance energy efficiency of biogas plants: Strategies, conditions and impacts. Energy Conversion and Management 231 (2021) 113759.

Li, L.; Feng, L.; Zhang, R.; He, Y.; Wang, W.; Chen, C.; Liu, G. Anaerobic digestion performance of vinegar residue in continuously stirred tank reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 186, 338–342.

Palatsi, J.; Viñas, M.; Guivernau, M.; Fernandez, B.; Flotats, X. Anaerobic digestion of slaughterhouse waste: Main process limitations and microbial community interactions. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 2219–2227.

Kafle, G.K.; Kim, S.H.; Sung, K.I. Ensiling of fish industry waste for biogas production: A lab scale evaluation of biochemical methane potential (BMP) and kinetics. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 127, 326–336.

Zhang, W.; Zhang, L.; Li, A. Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste with MSW incineration plant fresh leachate: Process performance and synergistic effects. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 259, 795–805.

Zhang, C.; Xiao, G.; Peng, L.; Su, H.; Tan, T. The anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and cattle manure. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 129, 170–176.

Yong, Z.; Dong, Y.; Zhang, X.; Tan, T. Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and straw for biogas production. Renew. Energy 2015, 78, 527–530.

Li, Y.; Jin, Y.; Li, H.; Borrion, A.; Yu, Z.; Li, J. Kinetic studies on organic degradation and its impacts on improving methane production during anaerobic digestion of food waste. Appl. Energy 2018, 213, 136–147.

Park, S.; Li, Y. Evaluation of methane production and macronutrient degradation in the anaerobic co-digestion of algae biomass residue and lipid waste. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 111, 42–48.

Xu, F.; Li, Y. Solid-state co-digestion of expired dog food and corn stover for methane production. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 118, 219–226.

Kazimierowicz, J.; Dzienis, L.; Dębowski, M.; Zieliński, M. Optimisation of methane fermentation as a valorisation method for food waste products. Biomass Bioenergy 2021, 144, 105913.

Lee, E.; Bittencourt, P.; Casimir, L.; Jimenez, E.; Wang, M.; Zhang, Q.; Ergas, S.J. Biogas production from high solids anaerobic co-digestion of food waste, yard waste and waste activated sludge. Waste Manag. 2019, 95, 432–439.

Rattanapan, C.; Sinchai, L.; Suksaroj, T.T.; Kantachote, D.; Ounsaneha, W. Biogas production by co-digestion of canteen food waste and domestic wastewater under organic loading rate and temperature optimization. Environments 2019, 6, 16.

Teixeira, R.A.; Bueno, B.A.; Borges, R.M.; Bringhenti, J .R. Biochemical Methane Potential o f Spent Coffee Grounds via Co-digestion with Food Waste. BioEnergy Res. 2021, 1–12.

Megido, L.; Negral, L.; Fernández-Nava, Y.; Suárez-Peña, B.; Ormaechea, P.; Díaz-Caneja, P.; Castrillón, L.; Marañón, E. Impact of organic loading rate and reactor design on thermophilic anaerobic digestion of mixed supermarket waste. Waste Manag. 2021, 123, 52–59.

Vitez, T.; Dokulilova, T.; Vitezova, M.; Elbl, J.; Kintl, A.; Kynicky, J.; Hladky, J.; Brtnicky, M. The Digestion of Waste from Vegetables and Maize Processing. Waste Biomass Valorization 2020, 11, 2467–2473.

Lin, J.; Zuo, J.; Gan, L.; Li, P.; Liu, F.; Wang, K.; Chen, L.; Gan, H. Effects of mixture ratio on anaerobic co-digestion with fruit and vegetable waste and food waste of China. J. Environ. Sci. 2011, 23, 1403–1408.

Shen, F.; Yuan, H.; Pang, Y.; Chen, S.; Zhu, B.; Zou, D.; Liu, Y.; Ma, J.; Yu, L.; Li, X. Performances of anaerobic codigestion of fruit & vegetable waste (FVW) and food waste (FW): Single-phase vs. two-phase. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 144, 80–85.

Benalia, S.; Falcone, G.; Stillitano, T.; De Luca, A.I.; Strano, A.; Gulisano, G.; Zimbalatti, G.; Bernardi, B. Increasing the content of olive mill wastewater in biogas reactors for a sustainable recovery: Methane productivity and life cycle analyses of the process. Foods 2021, 10, 1029

Zema, D.A.; Zappia, G.; Benalia, S.; Zimbalatti, G.; Perri, E.; Urso, E.; Tamburino, V.; Bernardi, B. Limiting factors for anaerobic digestion of olive mill wastewater blends under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. J. Agric. Eng. 2018, 49, 130–137.

Beniche, I.; Hungría, J.; El Bari, H.; Siles, J.A.; Chica, A.F.; Martín, M.A. Effects of C/N ratio on anaerobic co-digestion of cabbage, cauliflower, and restaurant food waste. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2021, 11, 2133–2145.

Chaurasia, A.K.; Siwach, P.; Shankar, R.; Mondal, P. Effect of pre-treatment on mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of fruit, food and vegetable waste. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2021, 25, 603–616.

El Gnaoui, Y.; Karouach, F.; Bakraoui, M.; Barz, M.; El Bari, H. Mesophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste: Effect of thermal pretreatment on improvement of AD process. Energy Rep. 2020, 6, 417–422.

Lun, Y.; Dai, H.-L.; Moayedi, H.; Le, B.N.; Adnan, R.M. Predicting steady-state biogas production from waste using advanced machine learning-metaheuristic approaches. Fuel 2023, 355, 129493.

Beltramo, T.; Klocke, M.; Hitzmann, B. Prediction of the biogas production using GA and ACO input features selection method for ANN model. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 6, 349–356.

Cruz, I.A.; de Melo, L.; Leite, A.N.; Sátiro, J.V.M.; Andrade, L.R.S.; Torres, N.H.; Padilla, R.Y.C.; Bharagava, R.N.; Tavares, R.F.; Ferreira, L.F.R. A new approach using an open-source low cost system for monitoring and controlling biogas production from dairy wastewater. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 241, 118284.

Bernardi, B.; Benalia, S.; Zema, D.; Tamburino, V.; Zimbalatti, G. An automated medium scale prototype for anaerobic co-digestion of olive mill wastewater. Inf. Process. Agric. 2017, 4, 316–320.

Scarcello, L.; Benalia, S.; Zimbalatti, G.; Fazari, A.; Bernardi, B. A Smart Automation System for the Management and Control o f a M edium S cale D igester P lant. I n AIIA 2022: Biosystems Engineering Towards the Green Deal: Improving the Resilience of Agriculture, Forestry and Food Systems in the Post-Covid Era; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2023; pp. 917–925.

Farhat, A.; Asses, N.; Ennouri, H.; Hamdi, M.; Bouallagui, H. Combined effects of thermal pretreat-ment and increasing organic loading by co-substrate addition for enhancing municipal sewage sludge anaerobic digestion and energy production. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2018, 119, 14–22.

Farhat, A.; Manai, I.; Gtari, M.; Bouallagui, H. Effect of enhancing nutrient balance in anaerobic digester feedstock by co-substrate addition on the microbial diversity and energy production from municipal sewage sludge. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2018, 126, 497–506.

Zema, D.A.; Fòlino, A.; Zappia, G.; Calabrò, P.S.; Tamburino, V.; Zimbone, S.M. Anaerobic digestion of orange peel in a semi-continuous pilot plant: An environmentally sound way of citrus waste management in agro-ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 630, 401–408.

Tufaner, F. Evaluation of COD and color removals of effluents from UASB reactor treating olive oil mill wastewater by Fenton process. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2020, 55, 3455–3466.

Neri, A.; Bernardi, B.; Zimbalatti, G.; Benalia, S. An Overview of Anaerobic Digestion of Agricultural By-Products and Food Waste for Biomethane Production. Energies 2023, 16, 6851.